α gp63 antibody (Cedarlane)
Structured Review

α Gp63 Antibody, supplied by Cedarlane, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 5 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/%CE%B1+gp63+antibody/10__3390_slash_pathogens13090718-104-28-30?v=Cedarlane
Average 93 stars, based on 5 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Exploration of the Binding Site of Arachidonic Acid in gp63 of Leishmania mexicana and in Orthologous Proteins in Clinically Important Parasites"
Article Title: Exploration of the Binding Site of Arachidonic Acid in gp63 of Leishmania mexicana and in Orthologous Proteins in Clinically Important Parasites
Journal: Pathogens
doi: 10.3390/pathogens13090718
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 1. Role of the L. mexicana gp63 protein in COX-like activity. (A) The plasmid map highlights a mutated NdeI site in the L. mexicana His-tag-gp63 protein, with a new peptide indicated by a pink arrow produced by a different reading frame. (B) Changes in the NdeI site’s reading frame in amino acids are shown for both wild type and mutant proteins. The red box signifies the insertion of two nucleotides, resulting in a 262 amino acid product with a molecular weight of 29 kDa. (C) Western blot analysis of proteins from E. coli DH5α transformed with wild-type (pPROEX-gp63) and mutant (pPROEX-gp63fs+2NDeI) plasmids on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel. Plasmid pPROEX served as a control. Recombinant gp63 proteins were detected using a commercial anti-tag histidine antibody (1:1000) in the presence of IPTG. Supernatant = SN; pellet = P. (D) Recombinant protein purification from Triton-X100 solubilized pellets of rpLmxPROEX-gp63 and rpLmxPROEX-gp63fs+2NDeI transformed bacteria, followed by Ni2+ resin incubation and analysis via 15 % SDS-PAGE and Western blot. Lanes 1 and 2 correspond to two eluates of the protein and wild recombinant, and in lanes 1′ and 2′, two eluates corresponding to the mutant recombinant protein are shown. (E) Assessment of COX-like activity in wild-type and mutant constructs’ total extracts using a COX activity kit, with the vector serving as a negative control. These experiments were carried out in triplicate conducted in three independently performed biological assays. Purified recombinant proteins were concentrated and subjected to dialysis with renaturation buffer. (F) COX activity detected in purified recombinant proteins, with analyses conducted in triplicate across two independent experiments.
Techniques Used: Activity Assay, Plasmid Preparation, Produced, Mutagenesis, Molecular Weight, Western Blot, Transformation Assay, SDS Page, Control, Recombinant, Protein Purification, Bacteria, Incubation, Construct, Negative Control, Purification
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 2. Analysis of RNA-seq data repositories from various parasites including L. mexicana (AMA = intracellular amastigotes; AXA = axenic amastigotes; PRO = promastigotes), T. cruzi, E. his- tolytica, E. dispar, E. invadens, A. castellanii, and N. fowleri. The figure illustrates the presence of transcripts per million (TPM) of mRNA corresponding to the gp63 protein in L. mexicana and or- thologous proteins in the analyzed parasites. The TPM value indicates a relative expression level across the samples. Data for this analysis were from AmoebaDB: http://amoebadb.org/amoeba/ (accessed on 28 September 2023 and TriTrypDB: https://tritrypdb.org (accessed on 28 September 2023). Therefore, to establish a possible functional relationship between orthologous proteins with gp63, a multiple alignment was performed. Figure 3A shows the alignment of the protein sequences of each parasite. The catalytic site region is indicated on a purple background, and the HExxHAxGF motif, which is conserved across the seven proteins analyzed, can be seen. The sequences of the candidate proteins were examined using the Pfam database to determine the presence of functional domains like the L. mexicana gp63 (Figure 3B). The results confirmed that all analyzed sequences share the same domain of the M8 peptidase family. This domain was reported to be present in L. mexicana gp63 [25]. This enzyme is found in eukaryotes, including Leishmania and other protozoan parasites. A domain of the Transcription Factor Immunoglobin (TIG) family, called IPT/TIG, was identified in the E. histolytica protein. This domain is characterized by a fold like that of immunoglobulin and is found in tyrosine kinase receptors such as Met and Ron receptors. In addition, this domain is also present in transcription factors involved in DNA binding [26] (Figure 3B).
Techniques Used: RNA Sequencing, Expressing, Functional Assay, Binding Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 3. (A) Multiple sequence alignments of proteins like the L. mexicana gp63 protein (XP_003872886.1) alongside counterparts from T. cruzi (XP_817808.1), E. histolytica (XP_652632.1), E. dispar (XP_001740726.1), E. invadens (XP_004184102.1), A. castellanii (XP_004337275.1), and N. fowleri (XP_044566011.1). The alignment, generated using Uniprot online platform, highlights highly con- served or identical residues in red. The green shading indicates identical residues, while light brown and yellow denotes moderately and low conserved residues, respectively. Red letters within blue boxes represent regions within 10 Å of the zinc atom, while the purple background highlights the catalytic site. (B) Conserved domains in proteins homologous to gp63. All examined proteins contain the leishmanolysin domain, belonging to the M8 peptidase family, spanning specific regions: 46–570 in L. mexicana, 58–510 in T. cruzi, 27–490 in E. histolytica, 28–490 in E. dispar, 32–423 in E. invadens, 103–406 in A. castellanii, and 222–632 in N. fowleri.
Techniques Used: Sequencing, Generated
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 5. Comparing the three-dimensional structures of proteins orthologous to L. mexicana gp63. The 3D structures of the analyzed proteins were modeled using the Swiss model. Subsequently, the overlap analysis of these structures was conducted using TopMatch-web. In the visual representation, structurally aligned sequences are highlighted in orange and red to indicate a match, while dissimilar structures are depicted in green or blue. (A) Comparative analysis between L. major (PDB ID: LML1) and L. mexicana (XP_003872886.1) is illustrated. (B) Comparison between the leishmanolysin (PDB ID: LML1) of L. major and protein XP_817808.1 of T. cruzi is shown. (C) Sequences from the genus Entamoeba (E. histolytica XP_652632.1, E. dispar XP_001740726, and E. invadens XP_004184102.1) are compared with the leishmanolysin (PDB ID: LML1) from L. major. (D) Comparative analysis with free-living amoebae, A. castellanii and N. fowleri (XP_004337275.1, XP_044566011.1), respectively, is presented.
Techniques Used: Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 7. The binding modes of arachidonic acid (AA) with targets of each parasite are as follows: L. mexicana involves hydrogen bonds with HIS264; T. cruzi shows hydrogen bonds with TYR379 and ARG416; E. histolytica forms hydrogen bonds with HIS206; and E. dispar establishes hydrogen bonds with HIS267 and GLU207. For A. castellanii and N. fowleri, the binding between the gp63-like proteins and AA occurs through hydrophobic bonds. The interaction of the zinc atom with the carboxylic acid of AA is shown in the images with a thick border.
Techniques Used: Binding Assay